On Tuesday, 04.01.2005 at 10:27 -0500, Brendan wrote:

> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:08, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 04.01.2005 at 09:22 -0500, Brendan wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 January 2005 04:26, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > > > In a country of 300M people, [...]
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like you're referring to the US.  Why restrict your
> > > > comment to the US?  Your remark would have more credibility if
> > > > you weren't so US-centric.
> > >
> > > I don't want to disrupt your obvious ploy for anti-US sentiment,
> > > but maybe he doesn't speak for other countries for a reason? Maybe
> > > he lives in the US?  Just a guess.
> >
> > My comment wasn't anti-US.  My comment was certainly
> > anti-UScentricism, though.
> >
> > I was pointing out that that the original poster appeared to be
> > speaking for the US, where the issue is larger than that.
> 
> So? He was speaking for what he knows. We should all be so smart.
> [...]

So he knows what 300 million USA residents think?  And yet nothing of
the remainder of the world's population?  Doubtful.

His original comment read "In a country of 300M people, there *will* be
some people who say, 'It sounds too black.'"  It would be more
reasonable to have simply removed "in a country of 300M people".  This
generalises his remark in a perfectly sensible way without putting on
the irritating US-centric hat.

Dave.

-- 
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/
Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to