On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. I could have written that sentence better. Here it is: > > Agreed. Unstable is recommended only for people that "know what they are > doing". Certainly not for desktop usage by casual users (if they are the > ones doing system administration), or anything like that. >
Why not stick to the descriptions on http://www.debian.org/releases/ {unstable/ | testing/ | stable\ } The description of unstable on the Debian homepage is: Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to this distribution. This distribution will never get released; instead, packages from it will propagate into testing and then into a real release. Security updates for "unstable" distribution are not managed by the security team. -Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
