-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005 02:21:32 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> The question is, what if I am fiddling with some feature and want to >> do a minor change to see if that fixes the problem. I shouldn't be >> made to do a complete recompile just because I made one single minor >> change. If you don't agree, you are ruining the pleasure of >> makefiles. > > Ah, if you understand Makefiles, you already know that you do > not have to call make-kpkg clean. The clean requirement is for people > who do _not_ understand Makefiles. > Yes, I do understand Makefiles a little. But when I build my kernel packages I don't want to manually go into that particular folder (say /usr/src/linux-x.x/video/) and do a make manually and come back and then build the package. make-kpkg is an excellent tool to ease and automate the kernel building process and I want to enjoy it. Is it harmful implementing the clean-all/force option ? Regards, rrs - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "Necessity is the mother of invention." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCelM94Rhi6gTxMLwRAkSjAJ9DCklSxD7v3Qvlz//lBbseIw1zfgCdEt9Z PfWWAxKb2Xm100/meX8KA84= =yyOy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
