Patrick Wiseman wrote: > No - the original poster suggested that both testing and unstable were > problematic after the last stable release. So I was concerned that > the new 'testing' would be flaky for a while. I've found the current > testing, which I've had in my sources.list for a couple of years now, > mostly reliable, with the occasional glitch. I can continue to live > with that. In other words, cutting edge is OK, but bleeding edge is a > bit too much for me! > > Thanks for everyone's advice. I think I'll stick with testing for now. >
You'll want to change "testing" to "sarge" if you want a stable system. If you leave it at testing, the system will go "haywire" a couple of weeks from now when etch becomes the new testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]