I agree with that point exactly. PS: 2 points for anybody that can figure out which point, or even which poster I'm agreeing with.
(I really did try to stay out of this...) phil Mark said: > Paul Johnson wrote: >>> On Thursday June 9 2005 5:10 pm, Patrick Wiseman wrote: >>> >>>>I completely agree. Whoever (the attribution is not clear to me) >>>>wrote that crap about top posters vs bottom posters is an arrogant >>>>idiot. Processing information in reverse order is much more >>>>efficient >>> >>> >>> Do you drive in reverse on the freeway, too? After all, doing it >>> backwards is more efficient. > > Wait a minute, When you read a book. You start on page one and read > right to the back of the book (Or bottom of the book) when you > finish. Right? > > Same (should) go for emails, you start at the top with reading, and > end up at the bottom where youre email answer begins. > > Is that not the best way of making it easier for other people to > understand your email? > > Still, bottom posters may be fighting a lost battle. In all the > companies i've worked for so far, there has not been a single > company with a "bottom" post policy of any kind. > > These companies are usually the "exchange server" kind... > > Thanks, > Mark > > p.s. > Sorry Paul, for replying to you alone... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
