On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:08:52PM -0600, Dave Babb wrote:
> OK......OK.....
> 
> I get it......
> 
> If I'm understanding what all of the responses have said <And THANK YOU by 
> the 
> way>
> 
> 
> Stability, robustness, testing, testing, more testing, cautious deployment of 
> new stuff, and keep all of the various architectures in sync.
> 
> The responses indicate that Debian is a distro to take into any server room, 
> deploy it, and not loose sleep about something blowing up when you leave.
> 
> I'm not opposed to that, as long as she can get newer packages if possible. 
> And 
> the threads I've just read have told me that my daughter can get all the new 
> stuff if she really wants it.
> 
> That's really all I needed to hear!
> 
> You see... My current distro on my box is Arch Linux, based upon Crux, is 
> exactly the opposite. Bleeding edge, short testing cycle, deploy and respond 
> to 
> things that go boom-boom. And being a engineer, I enjoy a little techie pull 
> your hair out stuff now and then. The boom-boom stuff has helped me sharpen 
> my 
> skills.
> 

If you like that sort of thing this is what you want to do:

1.  Go with Sid (unstable).
2.  If any packages you use have newer versions in experimental, give
them a shot.
3.  Check out the various Alioth projects for the ultra-bleeding edge
stuff.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr

Attachment: pgpiQ7c3BvvqK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to