On Monday 13 Jun 2005 17:35, Thomas Adam wrote: > So in that way, WMs are much faster, and most WMs are damn good at > managing the windows mapped to them.
That's debatable, actually. It could be argued that, since desktop environments *do* share libraries etc, they reduce redundancy and therefore memory and load times. One could even argue that, since the code in question is shared by different projects, it's more likely to have many eyes scanning it for opportunities to optimise code. -- Lee. Please do not CC replies directly to me. I'll read them on the list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
