Hal Vaughan wrote: > Actually, they are not as objective as one would think.
Statement with no backup, gotta love it.
> Putting a few sentences together in reverse order is not a comparison to
> top posting.
Yes, it is because that is exactly what top posting does.
> There are many reasons, in writing, to start with a conclusion.
This isn't one of them. Generally when one starts with a conclusion one
is not *replying* to someone else but is, in fact, giving a lecture.
> As to the "as /most/ points", I have yet to see anyone saying that show
> that they have the least insight into learning and perception styles and
> how different types of minds/personalities read and perceive information.
This isn't about how different minds/personalities read and perceive
information. It is about how things are done, why they are done that way and
how one can LEARN to do it that way if one weren't lazy.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
