> > I do agree. You really should go for 1.1 beta. This version is supposed > > Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when > I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6, > which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as when I mirrored > unstable 1.1. >
I also do agree here! 1.1 went to public beta a while ago. This should be mentioned on the mirror sites in an apropriate way. Yours, martin