Since my Ethernet interface is not recoginized, I tried the following command: ifconfig eth0 192.168.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.0
I got the following message: SIOCSIFADDR: NO such device SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device I am sure there is no physical problem with my Ethernet card, since I have two of them at handy. Please help! Tianlin Wang >From miss Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 1996 07:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 11924 invoked from smtpd); 26 Sep 1996 07:25:36 -0000 Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO primer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 1996 07:25:06 -0000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erick Branderhorst) Subject: Re: dpkg-1.4.0.1 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Romosan) Date:Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:10 +0100 Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from "Alex Romosan" at Sep 25, 96 10:18:41 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 215 Resent-Message-ID: <"0ZH5g2.0.UZ7.z6ZIo"@primer> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org Resent-Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/70 X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > i upgraded dpkg on one of the machines here to 1.4.0.1 and i've found > that dpkg-name is gone. was it intentional, or did it accidentally get > left out of the package? Isn't it in dpkg-dev right now? erick
