Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How many utilities would have to be changed to implement the > following password logic: > > If the stored hash is 13 characters long, use crypt(). > If it is 32 characters long, use md5sum(). > Otherwise, fail. > > This would allow us to retain backwards compatability while potentially > increasing the security of the system by allowing arbitrarily long > passwords.
I would love to see this happen. Wouldn't it be fairly easy if we successfully migrate to libpam? -- Rob -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
