At 10:23 PM 3/21/97 -0500, Jeff Shilt wrote: >Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the executable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing: > >//test.c
Don't call it "test". -- Matt
At 10:23 PM 3/21/97 -0500, Jeff Shilt wrote: >Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the executable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing: > >//test.c
Don't call it "test". -- Matt