On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote: > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will > **NOT** work with lprng. >
This is nice to know.... Sounds like the thing to do is work on lpr to get it working. Besides, I am running into as many problems getting lprng to work as I was lpr. But, I think the lpr problems might be easier to track down.... Can anyone tell me what the differences are between lpr and lprng. In what ways has lprng been ``enhanced and extended'', to quote the package description. Scott > > On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > ....Much Deleted..... > > > > > > > > The real fix seems to go to lprng. That's the official position of the > > > maintainer as well, as stated in a msg. to this list last year. I'll > > > do it as soon as I have a chance. > > > > > > > If the recommended fix (by the package maintainer even) is to switch from > > lpr to lprng, shouldn't lpr be switched out of Standard and lprng moved > > from Optional into Standard? > > > > I just happen to be having some problems setting up lpr as well. I think > > I'll switch to lprng before spending any more time. > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > -- > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org) > Custom Programming | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > >