(Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> mike horansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Using trn to thread articles is more convenient than using elm (a
> > GNUS-user tells me that its threading and searching are not as
> > good).
> 
> Gnus not as good at this as elm or trn... possible, but I'd be
> surprised.

As a mail-reader I'm sure gnus is more powerful than elm. I just like
elm's simplicity.

The most recent I've heard about gnus as a news-reader is that it
doesn't thread related articles as well as trn, nor is its searching
as good.


-- 
-Mike Horansky, Leland Consultant (http://consult.stanford.edu/)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OPINIONS EXPRESSED BY ME ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHARED BY MY EMPLOYERS.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Reply via email to