I am in fact using 2.1.36 and it seems pretty stable, a lot more so than 2.1.31 or 2.0.30. All my modules load without complaining about missing symbols. The only problem is that kerneld won't load them on demand.
--Brian Rick Jones wrote: > > I agree. I thought I'd seen someone using 2.1.36 but thought it was a > typo. I would like to see the absolute latest kernel's in unstable. > Seems to me that's what it's for. I seems to be used more as pre-stable > than unstable (a subtle difference). > > --Rick > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
