> On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
>
> > Seriously, I think they are fishing in the wrong place for idiots.
> >
> The "snagg rate" can be very low and still be "very" profitable when the
> "cost of doing business" is being paid by others. Doesn't matter how small
> that percentage is, given enough spam the return is sufficient to appear
> profitable.
So, how about making everybody who wants to subscribe to debian-user
sign some statement that they will never by anything from spammers, ever?
Seriously, though: Is there a way (with procmail or other) that
I can automatically forward all email with non-existant
Reply-To: addresses to /dev/null? That would probably halve the
amount of spam I get.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
