XFree86 tends to benchmark faster (using Matrox cards, which are by far the best/fastest cards under Linux) than either Metro-X or Accelerated X. It also has (imho) a better configuration program. From the limited contact I've had with Accelerated X technical support though they seem pretty good. And, of course, you need Accelerated X for some notebooks/weird video cards. (BTW, congrats to the XFree86/Matrox development team for the spectacular work they do.)
-Sam Message from Mike Nachlinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on %m-%N-%y: > Hi Will, > > Been using AcceleratedX for 3 years - No problems whatsoever. > Using a Matrox board, before that an ATI. > been using CDE for about 1 year, also from Xig - Works great. > The only problem at install regarded a Debian security feature > which allowed only root access. Just upgraded AcceleratedX to > 4.1 and suprise, no problems! Yea, I'm real happy with Xig - > and let me add ESTINC. for Bru 2000. Great stuff. I personally > use Linux because its better, not because it's free! -- VA Research Linux Workstations | The World's Best Linux Computers http://www.varesearch.com | Samuel Ockman | We are hiring... (650)934-3666, ext. 133 | Email ascii resume to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
