Hello! The guys from I2O left the specifications a good while on their server for anonymous ftp :)
Many people that writes hardware drivers for linux should have this document, I can imagine there was a good rush on their server before they removed the access to it... I2O is neither a problem nor a matter for Linux... On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Dan Hugo wrote: > I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O > organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they > THINK about the "technology" in I2O, and I recall reading somewhere that > the Linux community was NOT in favor of the whole concept (for obvious > reasons, given the limitations of that NDA). > > I am just wondering if there is going to be a general boycott I2O > hardware (or at least ignoring the IOP and the driver model), or whether > a reverse-engineering effort is planned or in the works. Since I don't > know much about I2O (I didn't feel like spending the $250 for a > temporary membership in their club... go figure), I wonder, if anyone > does know, is it all that great a "technology" ? > > It really looks like I2O is a concerted effort to keep free software and > OS's like Linux off the first tier by making driver development even > harder. > > Just wondering out loud > > -dh > > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .