Jens Ritter wrote: > You don´t have to. I always run my production system as bo (but ok, I > have got an unstable system, too. That´s because I want to take part > in the development.) The advantages/disadvantages of a hamm system are: > > 1) glibc6 > 2) New source format for packages > 3) A lot of more packages. > 4) Sometimes new uploads of packages can be broken. > > Unless you plan to develop libc6 or want to have some of the new > packages, there´s no need to upgrade. >
I want to develop, but not take part in the Linux development (maybe later, when i got into Linux deep enough to actually understand what to do). So it's better for me to use the stable kernel and packages, i think. Correct me if i'm wrong. Thanks for the information, Mac -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .