Kenneth L. Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would have to disagree. I like it the way it is. It is simple, elegant,
> and I don't have to search through five screens to find what I want. As for
> professional: I've seen plenty of "professional" sites that are cluttered,
> take *way* to long to download, and are hard to use.
>
> I would agree that a little more color and contrast might be nice (it is
> pretty white), and a unified structure (i.e., banners that match on every
> page, etc.) is a good thing. But I have to think that the basic structure
> is pretty good the was it is.
I agree with Ken. One of the good features of the current web
site is that it is as usable with lynx as it is with a GUI. Far too
many "professional" sites hide information and links inside graphics,
so a text-based bowser can't see them.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
