Hi,
On re-reading what I had written, yes, it could be interpreted
as I would find releasing all the packages each time unaccpetable.
That was not what I meant to convey. I would find relasing
weach one individually unacceptable. But if I could do it in
one go, it would be fine.
However, I jumped down Steves throat based on my
interpretation of what I wrote, not what a reasonable person would
gather. For that I apologize.
However, I stand behind my statement that two operations
everytime I upgrade is not too onerous.
I also ask Steve to file a bug against dpkg asking for a
optionally reversed default; that is the best way of getting this
message to the authors.
In the meanwhile, I think a reasonable work around has been
proposed.
manoj
--
Pray: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a
single petitioner confessedly unworthy. Ambrose Bierce
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
