Same results here - I'm running on a K5-75 (one of the 486-133 "turbo-chips") in a Digital DECPC and not having any problems (no problems that I didn't cause, anyway). Heard about all kinds of bugs in all the different chips (AMD, Cyrix, MMX, PII, etc.) and have yet to run into one on my systems (I have a K5-75, an Intel 486/100 and a PII-266 all running Debian).
>>--------------------------------------<< > ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 6:34 AM > To: Debian Users > Subject: Re: about K6 bug > > On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > > Sincerly speaking I have now idea how cricual is this, but as far as > > I consider K6 as a choice for upgrating my PC, I would like to know how > > reliable is this assuming that I have no intention to run this testing > > program very often. > > > > Have someone experienced any serious proplem with this cpu? > > I have used a K6-233 for about 8 months now (until yesterday). It hasn't > crashed in linux, and I've had uptimes > 2 months before rebooting to > windows. I used an AMD 5x86-133 before the K6. I just upgraded to a > PII-400 because I need the speed for some applications for work. The > new motherboard/cpu is slightly more than 2x faster than the K6 on my > applications so far. > > I would recommend AMD processors and I've got friends who really like > their cyrix chips on linux. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]