On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:51:41 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:41:59AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:29:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >> >> >A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because >> >the POP send is buggy, so you preferred cucipop. Now you say cucipop >> >doesn't even have POP send. Am I missing something here? >> >> Yes. You must read the *WHOLE* message and try to comprehend it. > >You're not here to make friends, are you, Steve? > >> " To me that is unforgivable and calls into question what other glaring >> errors are lurking just below the surface." >> >> IE, it isn't the fact that it is buggy, it is the nature of the bug which >> calls into question the quality of the rest of the code. On one had they >> adhere to RFC822 by using the escaped dor sequence. Then they turn around >> and *FAIL* to escape the same sequence they accepted when they pass it on. > >It is probably a simple oversight. Had you reported it, it could no doubt >be fixed easily (Miquel has indicated that he has already fixed some things >as necessary). I don't think a simple bug such as this is sufficient >to comment on the quality of the entire program. > >Miquel and others have indicated similarly user base sizes to you without >problems, which is strange. > > >Hamish >-- >Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 >CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org >
-- Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions! ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]