Dear Folks, I have benchmarked the performance of both the cdj550, hp850, and hpdj drivers in gs on my Debian box and the HP provided Windows driver. I used both photographs and scientific "visualized" data.
I'm using magicfilter and the parameters to gs were set as recommended in the various gs readmes. Although people in this group have remarked on the stunning results with gs, I find that the Windows generated images on the same printer is *far* superior in both detail and dynamic range. There were slight differences in the three gs drivers but not compared favorably to the Windows prints. Any idea what I might be doing wrong? --M =========================================================================== Martin Weinberg Phone: (413) 545-3821 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FAX: (413) 545-2117/0648 530 Graduate Research Tower University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003-4525 -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null