Hi,
A while ago you wrote to debian-user saying:
> Wow, why such complexities? Try VM under Emacs or (better) XEmacs. You
> get the best of all worlds. When you're in X you get clickable URLs
> and HTML rendering (and toolbars and inline image attachment viewing
> and all the other stuff you see in graphical clients), and when you're
> at the console you get a regular textual client a la pine.
What advantages does XEmacs have over Emacs (and are there any the other
way around)? I am using emacs at the moment. Is it worth me changing?
And what is VM? Is it an mh based mailer?
Thanks,
Mark.
_/~~~~~~~~\___/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________
____/~~\_____/~~\__/~~\__________________________Mark_Phillips____________
____/~~\_____/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____/~~\HE___/~~\__/~~\APTAIN_____________________________________________
____/~~\______/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
"They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them!"
