> Yeah, and a whole bunch of other people. Basicly the article's slant is > be afraid of Debian, be very afraid.
I couldn't believe the way they portrayed Debian as a commercial product -- even the X days of support (that's your job George:-). The one strong positive they noted -- the package management -- wasn't explained very clearly at all. Gosh, after reading that article you'd wonder how Debian became the second-largest Linux...what a bunch of idiots we are for running it, eh?! :-) I think this calls for a calm, well-reasoned letter (perhaps from the project leader or someone in a Debian position of authority?) explaining the non-commercial slant of Debian and correcting a few errors. -- Regards, | REDMOND, WA (API) --- MICROSOFT (MSFT) announced today . | the the official release date for the new operating Randy | system "Windows 2000" will be delayed until the second | quarter of 1901 due to year 2000 problems.