Wayne Topa dixit: ~> ~> Subject: Re: Help! More problems compiling kernel ~> Date: Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 02:43:38PM +0200 ~> ~> In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> ~> ln -s kernel-source-2.0.35 linux ~> > ~> ls -l should show you that linux -----> points to kernel-source-2.0.35 ~> ~> > cd \linux *** without the link (ln -s ) there isn't a linux ~> dir after you did the mv linux kernel-source-2.0.35
I forgot to write it down here, but I surely did it. I've found many problems, downloaded kernels from different places (.gz and .bz2), fixed myself wrong headers (probably corrupted due to line noise and/or during source installation) ... Finally I got one error message about the compiler, so I've decided to upgrade as much as I can. I've downloaded (from Slink): bin86_0.14.3-1.deb (and I already have binutils_2.9.1-0.2 installed) cpp_2.7.2.3-7.deb (BTW, what's cpp_2.91.66-0slink1_alpha.deb from proposed upgrades?) gcc_2.7.2.3-7.deb gcc-docs_2.7.2.3-7.deb glibc-doc_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb make_3.77-4.deb make-doc_3.77-4.deb I hope there's nothing else missing, and not having any trouble upgrading all that load. I've also tried to upgrade gdb (I've got 4.17-0.1), but haven't been able to find it. It would be much better to upgrade to Slink at once, but I've been waiting for more than a month for LSL to deliver the CDs. One final question... following /usr/src/linux/README instructions, I removed asm/, linux/, and scsi/ from /usr/include/ and remade them as symlinks to asm-i386/, linux/, and scsi/ in /usr/src/linux/include/linux/ ... but if I now removed the kernel source... what will it be? orphan symlinks? will that be a problem? Horacio -- Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver o/or Envía un mensaje vacío a [EMAIL PROTECTED] con la línea de asunto: Send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject line: Tipo de Clave/Key Type Asunto:/Subject: DSA/ElGamal fetch dsa/elgamal DSS/Diffie-Hellman fetch dh/dss RSA fetch rsa
