On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 05:15:29PM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote: > Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > => > => Using 'apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade' appears to be safer than > => upgrading with dselect. The offending packages are held back and > => netscape, etc., are not marked for removal. > > Ahh! I was wondering why I saw around four packages held back when I last > upgraded. Thanks for that, too!!! Apt-get is truly remarkable.
I'm too paranoid to use apt-get upgrade... at least with dselect you actually get so see *which* packages are getting upgraded/removed/etc. I can't see how blindly using apt-get upgrade can be safer. Anyone that trashes their system with dselect really should learn to pay a bit more attention to what they do. :) BTW, I took a look at apt-find... I notice on the help screen that there appears to be no way to explicitly 'hold' a package... was that intentional, or an oversight? Mike [I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC: me on replys.] -- Michael Merten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---> NRA Life Member (http://www.nra.org) ---> Debian GNU/Linux Fan (http://www.debian.org) ---> CenLA-LUG Founder (http://www.angelfire.com/la2/cenlalug) -- In Tennessee, it is illegal to shoot any game other than whales from a moving automobile.