Brian Servis wrote: > > Ok. To my way of thinking it should be called kernel-image_2.0.34, > > kernel-image_2.0.36-3, etc. That way apt-get upgrade would grab updated > > kernels for the user. > > If kernel-images did not have the version in the package name then you > could not have two different versions of the kernel installed at the > same time.
We could still have a latest-kernel-image-2.0_2.0.38 and latest-kernel-image-2.2_2.2.12 that some users could choose to use instead. Peter
