Michael Stenner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Let me get this straight: Some person (Joe) writes to a list and you > get the mail. You hit "g" and Joe is not listed as a recipient? > > That might be some funky "reply-to" stuff that I haven't run > into. Sorry.
The Mail-Followup-To: header seems to have this effect. Dwayne has this on his message; so, for example, when I hit 'g' on these two messages, the resulting To: header just had Dwayne and debian-user (the contents of his Mail-Followup-To:) in it, and not you (Michael). So I manually removed Dwayne's address and just left debian-user. Does anyone know how to make mutt override the Mail-Followup-To: header? :-( Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Let me get this straight: Some person (Joe) writes to a list and you > > get the mail. You hit "g" and Joe is not listed as a recipient? > > Yep, and I am unstead. (And I don't think metoo is even set, either) If you're being listed as a recipient without setting "metoo", it's probably because mutt doesn't know your e-mail address. Set the "alternates" variable to contain all of your e-mail addresses. Mine, for instance, is: set alternates="^([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$" (Those 4 addresses are all the possible addresses which end up in my mailbox on my home system. Of course the last two won't work for anyone on the Internet -- they're just for my LAN.) -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Red Hot Chili Peppers, http://www.kellnet.com/wooledge/ |
pgpajuVJM66FT.pgp
Description: PGP signature