is that security hole that packet thing , shit i forget the name, it was in 2.0.35 then backed out of .36 because of compadiblity issues ?? please specify the hole..i use 2.0.36+securelinux. am testing 2.0.38+ow4 (http://www.openwall.com/linux/) as a replacement for 2.0.36+securelinux. i am very satisfied with the performance and stability and security of 2.0.36+securelinux (my kernel is about a year old). i expect 2.0.38+ow4 will give me similar satisfaction.
nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Joey Hess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am running slink with kernel 2.0.36. Is there any advantage to upgrading > > the kernel. If so, which kernel would be best? > > Your kernel has a well known security hole. You should at least upgrade to > 2.0.37. > > -- > see shy jo > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
