> QT v1 is included in the non-free section. The problem is that KDE is > supposed to be under the GPL but is violating the GPL by linking to QT > which is non-free. So Debian and others decided not to include KDE > until they either fixed the licensing issues or QT became free. QT v2 > is under less restrictive license and thus once KDE is built with the > new QT then it will go in main. This is all just my rough > interpetation.
See this I don't understand. If they're not including KDE because it has a non-free program as a dependency, then what about Licq? In the stable tree, it depends on qt1g: http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/net/licq.html http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/libs/qt1g.html -- Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727 B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com Join AllAdvantage.com and get paid to surf the Web! http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ARD582
