On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 03:59:46PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I sometimes wish we could settle on some of these key technologies, > > like the two rc schemes, and inetd versus xinetd. It would make a lot > > of things similar. Imagine if we had two menu systems. Similar confusion > > happens with the documentation systems. > > I disagree, I think we should settle on an interface that allows multiple > implementations. Settling on the sysv init.d would be a tie us to something > many people despise with a passion. It would make it hard to ever switch to > anything more flexible.
Seems reasonable. We need a common interface, anyway. There seem to be a lot of inetd versus xinetd bugs at times, and perhaps sysvinit versus filerc too. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]