[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Dysthe) wrote: [Also to debian-devel]
>On 27 Jan, paul wrote: >| 2) Libc5 version works a little better than libc6. > >I tried both. I have never been able to see much difference. Well, I was going to try out the libc6 version for a while when it appeared in potato (or am I going mad and it was libc6 all along?), but the netscape-base-4 maintainer appears to have decided that it should be libc5 again. :( I'm reminded of a yo-yo ... Is there any reason why we can't have netscape-libc5 and netscape-libc6 packages? It would seem to solve a lot of problems with people who need one or the other, and eliminate this switching back and forth. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]