Michel Verdier wrote: > [cut] > Everybody knows that .deb are usually the last to be released to increase > stability for .deb packages. When security is an issue .rpm and .deb are > both tested and it would be great to have statistics to know which is the > quicker to be installed and used. > I must say, my subjective experience has been that rpm's are much faster to install something. Of course, it's also faster to throw my clothes on the floor, rather than put them in the hamper...
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need in... Steve Lamb
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I nee... Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I... Steve Lamb
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need in... Steve Morocho
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I nee... Karl M. Hegbloom
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I nee... Michel Verdier
- Re[2]: Debian vs Red Hat???... Steve Lamb
- Re: Re[2]: Debian vs Re... Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I... Josip Rodin
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I... Keith G. Murphy
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Josip Rodin
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian vs Red ... Craig Sanders
- Cleaning up the dp... Joachim Trinkwitz
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need in... Sanjeev \"Ghane\" Gupta
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I nee... Chip Salzenberg