Nathan E Norman wrote:
Yeah..you are right. It is another case of "do what I mean not what I say" <grin>.On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:59:13PM -0600, Donald Spoon wrote:John Hasler wrote:Donald Spoon writes: -Snip- <It uses the presence of this file as a "trigger" to decide whether to start the pppd program in the demand mode at boot time or not.No. It uses the presence of this file as a "trigger" to decide whether to start the pppd program at bootup. Whether or not it starts in demand mode depends on how the "provider" peer is configured.I thought that is what I said. I don't get the "difference"...No, you said the file acted as a trigger to start ppp _in demand mode_. It's right there in the quoted section. :-) I suspect you meant to say what John said but careless sentence construction resulted in something else (no offense meant).
I suffer from being a Missouri "hick" and living in Texas. Communicating is sometimes a problem....
Cheers,
-Don Spoon-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]