On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote: > will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/02/2001 (10:12) : > > if he's using mutt, no munging of the reply-to field is > > necessary: > > > > to reply to the sender, use mutt's "r" key. that'll reply > > off-list to the sender, and nobody else will be the wiser. > > > > to reply PUBLICLY to a list, use mutt's "L" key. it looks for > > 'x-mailing-list' headers and uses that as the reply-to, but only > > *IF* you've set up your ~/.muttrc to recognize the list name: > > Or you can use the "g" key which will send to both the list and the > sender.
Except, given the conditions above, this is the wrong thing to do. It's a list; use the reply to list function! The world will be a better place when people start respecting Mail-Followup-To: :) -- Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better Micromuse Inc. | than a perfect plan tomorrow. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Patton
pgplEXppxRaDZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature