On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 23:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 31 Dec 1969 23:59:59 +0000 > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2003 : Issue 489 > > Today's Topics: > Ongoing named trouble [ Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: More detailed post ... [ martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: Ongoing named trouble [ Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: sndfile.pc ? [ James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: Ardour debs? [ James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: security [ Jeffrey Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: good sources.list [ Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > subscribe [ Nigel Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: good sources.list [ Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: Howto set up a local apt - repos [ mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > maildir vs. mbox vs. mh ??? [ "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: good sources.list [ Jeffrey Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: More detailed post ... [ martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > problem with courier-pop-ssl [ martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: sndfile.pc ? [ stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: mysql root user password, and De [ stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Shells [ "Radek Zajkowski [Deb]" <debian@fin ] > Re: More detailed post ... [ Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian-User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Ongoing named trouble > Date: 09 Feb 2003 13:07:24 -0600 > > I have, for quite some time, had trouble with my BIND installation > falsely claiming that certain domains don't exist. It tends to be > pretty consistent about them - anything under yahoo.com can be counted > on to display this, for instance. > > The symptom, which is primarily noticable for outgoing email (handled > by exim) and web browsing (netscape or mozilla), is that the first > attempt to resolve the domain gets a 'not found' response, but > retrying immediately afterward works fine. The domain then works > properly for a while (presumably until the information on it gets > dropped from BIND's cache), then it gives the spurious 'not found' > again. This is presumably a timeout issue, but I haven't been able > to verify that theory. > > For web browsing, it's an annoyance, but not a big deal - just > resubmit the request and it works the second time. In mail, however, > it's more significant... It started out with just getting > 'non-routable mail domain' bounces and resending the message, but now > I'm running a mailing list with a couple subscribers from UK domains > that display this problem and Mailman eats the bounces, so there's no > way to even detect when it happens until someone looks at the list > archive and notices that there are archived messages which he never > received. > > In my attempts to resolve this problem, I've updated my root hints > and double-checked that I'm set to use my ISP's name servers as > forwarders and that they work properly. (Interestingly enough, > testing them again just before sending this message, both of the ISP > nameservers resolved mail.yahoo.com instantly, but mine took several > seconds to do so. Trying it again after a BIND restart, the first > attempt came back with "can't find mail.yahoo.com: Non-existent > host/domain" after 15 seconds on the first try, found the address > after 5 seconds on the second try, and responded instantly on the > third. This is repeatable.) > > What do I need to do to my configuration, whether of BIND or of exim, > to make mail delivery bit more reliable? I would, ideally, like to > fix this in BIND, of course, but at this point I would settle for a > configuration setting to tell exim to always try delivery twice, even > if the first attempt gets a 'Non-existent host/domain' error. > > -- > The freedoms that we enjoy presently are the most important victories of the > White Hats over the past several millennia, and it is vitally important that > we don't give them up now, only because we are frightened. > - Eolake Stobblehouse (http://stobblehouse.com/text/battle.html) > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: More detailed post ... > Date: 09 Feb 2003 20:11:06 +0100 > > --AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > also sprach Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.09.1912 +0100]: > > ...to lists; I read them. > > This is a lot better. Thanks. > > --=20 > Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them. > =20 > .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system > =20 > NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken! > Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc > > --AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+RqfKIgvIgzMMSnURAgr8AKDpcfHgRdjK5WhQXppKhfY2i7a8bgCaAvHI > Q4qDED3osA3KOw1qkoFF0b0= > =e8Xi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD-- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian-User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Ongoing named trouble > Date: 09 Feb 2003 14:50:02 -0500 > > You could always get rid of bind altogether and switch to the djbdns > stuff (tinydns and dnscache). On my home machine I was constantly > battling little bind issues, but since I started using djbdns, things > have been very smooth. > > I know this isn't a suggestion of what to do with bind, but oftentimes > when I start to get annoyed with a certain piece of Linux based > software, I just pull up freshmeat and find something else that might > give me more of the solution that I'm looking for. > > Sean > > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 14:07, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > I have, for quite some time, had trouble with my BIND installation > > falsely claiming that certain domains don't exist. It tends to be > > pretty consistent about them - anything under yahoo.com can be counted > > on to display this, for instance. > > > > The symptom, which is primarily noticable for outgoing email (handled > > by exim) and web browsing (netscape or mozilla), is that the first > > attempt to resolve the domain gets a 'not found' response, but > > retrying immediately afterward works fine. The domain then works > > properly for a while (presumably until the information on it gets > > dropped from BIND's cache), then it gives the spurious 'not found' > > again. This is presumably a timeout issue, but I haven't been able > > to verify that theory. > > > > For web browsing, it's an annoyance, but not a big deal - just > > resubmit the request and it works the second time. In mail, however, > > it's more significant... It started out with just getting > > 'non-routable mail domain' bounces and resending the message, but now > > I'm running a mailing list with a couple subscribers from UK domains > > that display this problem and Mailman eats the bounces, so there's no > > way to even detect when it happens until someone looks at the list > > archive and notices that there are archived messages which he never > > received. > > > > In my attempts to resolve this problem, I've updated my root hints > > and double-checked that I'm set to use my ISP's name servers as > > forwarders and that they work properly. (Interestingly enough, > > testing them again just before sending this message, both of the ISP > > nameservers resolved mail.yahoo.com instantly, but mine took several > > seconds to do so. Trying it again after a BIND restart, the first > > attempt came back with "can't find mail.yahoo.com: Non-existent > > host/domain" after 15 seconds on the first try, found the address > > after 5 seconds on the second try, and responded instantly on the > > third. This is repeatable.) > > > > What do I need to do to my configuration, whether of BIND or of exim, > > to make mail delivery bit more reliable? I would, ideally, like to > > fix this in BIND, of course, but at this point I would settle for a > > configuration setting to tell exim to always try delivery twice, even > > if the first attempt gets a 'Non-existent host/domain' error. > > > > -- > > The freedoms that we enjoy presently are the most important victories of the > > White Hats over the past several millennia, and it is vitally important that > > we don't give them up now, only because we are frightened. > > - Eolake Stobblehouse (http://stobblehouse.com/text/battle.html) > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: sndfile.pc ? > Date: 09 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0500 > > --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:38:08PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:07:21PM -0500, stan wrote: > > > Sigh, I'm still fighting the battle of trying to compile Ardour (why ha= > sn't > > > someone done a deb of this). > > >=20 > > > In any case, I manged to get autogen.sh to run, only to have configure = > fail > > > looking for a file called sndfile.pc. It seems to be searching for this > > > with /usr/bin/pkg-config. > > >=20 > > > Anyone habe any clues on this? > > Hi, I'm trying to build ardour as well on sid. I'm having some luck > just doing 'apt-cache search' on all the stuff that configure barfs > on, eg: > > apt-cache search sndfile > libsndfile0 - Library for reading/writing audio files > libsndfile0-dev - Library for reading/writing audio files > libsndfile1 - Library for reading/writing audio files > libsndfile1-dev - Library for reading/writing audio files > sndfile-programs - Sample programs that use libsndfile > > libsndfile1-dev did the trick I think. However, that won't be the end > of your problems. Currently configure is looking for a file named > ladspa.h, which is in the ladspa-sdk package; however the package > description says, > 'Please build-depend on this package if you need ladspa.h' > > Can someone give me a quick run-down on how to do this? > > > > --=20 > James Hughes > > --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+RrMU2IxfNrIXgXcRAlPyAKDcjkEECFEW5szCISESQuUHhZt3OgCdEYey > g/vFs9k683oLPejsS3brrCE= > =9xUu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: James Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Ardour debs? > Date: 09 Feb 2003 15:05:14 -0500 > > --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 08:13:28PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:22:23PM -0500, stan wrote: > > > I discoverd Ardour today, courtesy of a Slashdot post. > > >=20 > > > Looks like just what I need. > > >=20 > > > Anyone have a line on debs for it? > >=20 > > The general answer is apt-get.org, followed by google, but I think > > ardour is a special case, where the developers asked for it not to be > > packaged yet...I think... > =46rom the ardour FAQ, referring to the question "why no tarballs?", but > I think you could apply it to debs as well: > > Why no tarballs? > > a) Because at this point in its development, I don't want to deal with > bug reports from a version that's more than 3 hours old. I am not > going to build and upload tarballs every 3 hours. Ardour sometimes > changes dramatically internally several times in a day. CVS lets > people easily, quickly, cheaply get the latest changes and build a > completely up-to-date version. > > =09 > > > --=20 > James Hughes > > --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+RrR62IxfNrIXgXcRAulRAJ9MNLgt5YRj+oFGEFSzSWs75SMI6ACeMxeq > P48BZU/ubLkroF+/S52dsuw= > =2D3g > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ-- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Jeffrey Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: security > Date: 09 Feb 2003 14:12:14 -0600 > > Quoting Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [DISCLAIMER: I've played with this here at home, and think I've got a > > fairly secure system, but I'm no expert, I'm just an interested geek] > > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:21:33PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > > > Is anyone here running a Debian system with no daemons running as root > > > other than init, inetd, and sshd, no SUID-root programs other than > > > passwd, su, etc, and generally having everything locked down as much > > > as possible (chroot's for daemons, etc)? > > > > I'm running bind9 in a chroot (using Martin's bind9-chroot package); > > everything else is as normal. > > > > It has been possible since BIND 8.x to run it non-root. I did it on > my main machine (non-Debian). It took a little fiddling with > permissions and ownership so it could read & write the configuration > and zone files. Figure an hour to get it to work. I should invest > another hour to improve the solution. I now think it can be done more > securely. > > Jeffrey > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: good sources.list > Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:17:09 -0900 > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 09:05 am, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got a question about apt and dselect. > > ATM sources.list contains: > > > > Deb http://devel-home.kde.org/~nolden/kde stable main > > Deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free > > Deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free > > Deb http://people.debian.org/~kov/debian woody gnome2 > > > > I was wondering this is _enough_. Of course it's enough, Debian is > > running well, but maybe there are other important sources not listed > > abouve. > > > > If there are suggestions, tell me. I'm running woody 3.0r0 with kde3.1 > > > > HTH, > > > > Willem-Jan Meijer, Netherlands > > For official Debian mirror sites there is an app, 'netselect', (man > netselect)that will find the quickest mirror for your location. > 'netselect-apt' will use the list of mirrors from Debian.org, find the > fastest one to your location, then write a sources.list file. Interesting > info on different mirror sites. > > -- > Greg Madden > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Nigel Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: subscribe > Date: 09 Feb 2003 20:35:53 +0000 > > -- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: good sources.list > Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:43:37 -0900 > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 11:17 am, Greg Madden wrote: > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 09:05 am, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've got a question about apt and dselect. > > > ATM sources.list contains: > > > > > > Deb http://devel-home.kde.org/~nolden/kde stable main > > > Deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free > > > Deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free > > > Deb http://people.debian.org/~kov/debian woody gnome2 > > > > > > I was wondering this is _enough_. Of course it's enough, Debian is > > > running well, but maybe there are other important sources not listed > > > abouve. > > > > > > If there are suggestions, tell me. I'm running woody 3.0r0 with > > > kde3.1 > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > Willem-Jan Meijer, Netherlands > > > > For official Debian mirror sites there is an app, 'netselect', (man > > netselect)that will find the quickest mirror for your location. > > 'netselect-apt' will use the list of mirrors from Debian.org, find the > > fastest one to your location, then write a sources.list file. > > Interesting info on different mirror sites. > > I need to add netselect is only measuring network latency to the mirror > site, bandwidth of the mirror site is not part of this. > > -- > Greg Madden > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Howto set up a local apt - repository ? (solved) > Date: 09 Feb 2003 20:22:11 +0100 > > Hello, > i did a little rtfm now about 'dpkg-scanpckages'. > It wasn't as much difficult. > One has to provide the newly to create 'Packages' file in the > deb-packages-dir before updating apt. > There was some trouble because woody packages were mixed up with i guess > sarge, which confuses new built dependencies. > Anyway, in the openoffice major package i looked up what exactly is needed > (going to install three languages stuff) and managed to sort things out. > First time i ditched a filemanager for shell-expansions....never been in such > situation ! Quite motivating. > > cheers > -- > > micha. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Michael D. Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Users List Service <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: maildir vs. mbox vs. mh ??? > Date: 09 Feb 2003 15:05:42 -0600 > > Considering moving from mbox to maildir a very large (~2GB, ~1000000 > messages) email archive. Mostly concerned with the integrity of > receiving messages intact. > > Obviously, this will impact performance and inodes used. > > Given this brief overview, what ought I to consider? > > Are there other options to consider? > > How else might I handle this data? > > What do you think? > > -- > > Best Regards, > > mds > mds resource > 888.250.3987 > > Dare to fix things before they break . . . > > Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we > think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Jeffrey Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: good sources.list > Date: 09 Feb 2003 15:14:38 -0600 > > Quoting Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] > > For official Debian mirror sites there is an app, 'netselect', (man > > netselect)that will find the quickest mirror for your location. > > 'netselect-apt' will use the list of mirrors from Debian.org, find the > > fastest one to your location, then write a sources.list file. Interesting > > info on different mirror sites. > > > > This does not get the security.debian.org sites, so be sure to add > them after running netselect-apt. > > Jeffrey > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: More detailed post ... > Date: 09 Feb 2003 22:17:57 +0100 > > --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.09.1955 +010= > 0]: > > then that person shouldn't set the Mailto-Followup header! > > actually, yes s/he should, just differently... ;^> > > http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html > =20 > --=20 > Please do not CC me when replying to lists that I read! > =20 > .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system > =20 > NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken! > Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc > > --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+RsWFIgvIgzMMSnURAhSaAKDae9DZM9/tG8cnnKTfSX0trN0EEwCg1jNz > VELUb8++sDzr6u7WGlHb9Cs= > =W6/K > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC-- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: problem with courier-pop-ssl > Date: 09 Feb 2003 22:15:29 +0100 > > --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > hi all, > > i have a user trying to contact my pop3-ssl server (courier, with > a certificate signed by my own CA =3D=3D unpublished CA) from Eudora > 5.2/Mac, and it's not working on her end. > > on my end, i see a couple of packets exchanged before the mailhost > sends her a TCP reset. in the logs, i then see this: > > pop3d-ssl: starttls: accept: error:140890E9:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:tls peer did not respond with > certificate list > > what's going on? why is it sending a starttls to port 995 in the > first place? > > does anyone know how to get eudora to play nicely with pop3-ssl? > > --=20 > Please do not CC me when replying to lists that I read! > =20 > .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system > =20 > NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken! > Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc > > --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+RsTxIgvIgzMMSnURAjmcAKC6HAVQogWpyYDtuYAQ55Wp1f4qkgCfSNGS > 4olxyMQQAluELrv8Syrdw/w= > =le42 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: sndfile.pc ? > Date: 09 Feb 2003 16:35:56 -0500 > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:59:16PM -0500, James Hughes wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:38:08PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:07:21PM -0500, stan wrote: > > > > Sigh, I'm still fighting the battle of trying to compile Ardour (why hasn't > > > > someone done a deb of this). > > > > > > > > In any case, I manged to get autogen.sh to run, only to have configure fail > > > > looking for a file called sndfile.pc. It seems to be searching for this > > > > with /usr/bin/pkg-config. > > > > > > > > Anyone habe any clues on this? > > > > Hi, I'm trying to build ardour as well on sid. I'm having some luck > > just doing 'apt-cache search' on all the stuff that configure barfs > > on, eg: > > > > apt-cache search sndfile > > libsndfile0 - Library for reading/writing audio files > > libsndfile0-dev - Library for reading/writing audio files > > libsndfile1 - Library for reading/writing audio files > > libsndfile1-dev - Library for reading/writing audio files > > sndfile-programs - Sample programs that use libsndfile > > Mmm, I've installed all of those, I think, but perhaps from testing, rather > thna unstable. > > > > > libsndfile1-dev did the trick I think. However, that won't be the end > > of your problems. Currently configure is looking for a file named > > ladspa.h, which is in the ladspa-sdk package; however the package > > description says, > > 'Please build-depend on this package if you need ladspa.h' > > > > Can someone give me a quick run-down on how to do this? > > I'd be interested in hearing if you get this working. It appears that the > devloper of Ardour has suceded in upseting the Debian developers, and they > are'nt interested in doing anythign with this package. Too bad, as I have > lot's of LP's thta I wan't to read in, and this package would be a big > asset (along with gramofile), on doing this. I wisht these 2 projects could > get together. > > In any case, I've got several other projects on my plate (mythtv for one), > so I don;t know how much more time I'm going to have for this one. > > Thanks for the info. > > > > -- > "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve > neither liberty nor safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mysql root user password, and Debian updates > Date: 09 Feb 2003 16:44:24 -0500 > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 12:49:44PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: > > Do you have the mysql root password stored in /root/.my.cnf > > as detailed in /usr/share/doc/mysql-server/README.Debian? > > > > I didn't, but I do now: > > -rw------- 1 root root 91 Feb 9 16:40 .my.conf > > # an example of /root/.my.cnf > [mysql] > user = root > password = XXXXX > > > But sstill no go... > > > Setting up mysql-server (3.23.52-2) ... > Stopping MySQL database server: mysqld. > dpkg: error processing mysql-server (--configure): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 > Errors were encountered while processing: > mysql-server > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > > -- > "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve > neither liberty nor safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Radek Zajkowski [Deb] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Shells > Date: 09 Feb 2003 16:42:18 -0500 > > I'm using the bash shell, but in the package list in dselect it lists korn > and zsh as loaded as well. Can I just unistall them or does my system needs > them anyway? > > R> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: More detailed post ... > Date: 09 Feb 2003 16:42:01 -0500 > > on Sun, 09 Feb 2003 10:17:57PM +0100, martin f krafft insinuated: > > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.09.1955 +0100]: > > > then that person shouldn't set the Mailto-Followup header! > > > > actually, yes s/he should, just differently... ;^> > > > > http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html > > fine, you win. but that person would have the *option* of not setting > the header to elicit the same effect from MUAs that do comply with the > Mailto-Followup header, right? > > </nori> -- Tom Vergote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]