-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Dave Whiteley wrote:
>We are a University department rather than a company, but I have no >reservations about recommending Debian. Some of my collegues use Red >Hat for their personal work, (for their own good reasons), but I seem >to encounter less problems than they do. ATM it'd be stupid to recommend Red Hat for a large firm unless they had an existing maintenance contract. Red Hat has recently announced plans to allow only one machine per entity free use of up2date, Red Hat's weak impersonation of apt. One machine just isn't enough to make a proof of concept in a firm of more than about 50 people, and the whole point of using a distribution is ease of upgrade. >Dave > > > > >On 26-Mar-2001 Gregor Kaleta wrote: >> Does somebody use Linux professional in the company? If yes, which >> Distribution? Does Debian be used also in the professional area or >> is >> the first election RedHat Linux? >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >---------------------------------- >E-Mail: Dave Whiteley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 26-Mar-2001 >Time: 15:54:48 >Phone: 0113 233 2059 > >Missing .sig (I am trying to give them up.) >---------------------------------- > > > - -- There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on a million keyboards for a million years, eventually all the works of Shakespeare would be produced. Now, thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true. Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBOr+VUB9mehuYcOjMEQKZagCg04eiI2xm/+PYT0pYIfTXilriBbUAn1Ny 0oyK1rVwhvRAWrWYPaFJcF7A =mzfV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
