On February 21, 2003 05:26 pm, Levi Waldron wrote: > that using spamd would be so much faster. I could switch to fetchmail for > the sake of spamd, although reading through the documentation I see that > the spamc daemon could also improve my performance without changing my mail > setup at all. I'll give that a try first, and report back...
Minor correction: spamc is a command-line client for spamd. Calling spamc does in fact work much, much faster than calling spamassassin (a small fraction of a second instead of 5-10s). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
