Be careful here: smail is not sendmail; I think it was largely an
attempt to simplify the configuration while retaining command-line
compatibility.
While exim was really a bit of a rewrite of smail.
So smail might have been a pretty good default.
Someone correct me if I got something wrong above...
"W. Paul Mills" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Sherohman) writes:
>
> I can remember when smail was the *default* -- that cured me of
> using debian defaults! Interesting story.
>
> >
> > Actually, given all the Debian-centric info on BIND, I was kind of surprised
> > that he wasn't running Debian's default MTA: exim. (OTOH, exim's handling
> > of aliases and virtual domains is a lot simpler than sendmail's (oh, hell -
> > damn near _anything_ is simpler than configuring sendmail), so the story
> > would've lost at least 30-40 lines of explanations if exim was used.)
> >
>
> --
> * For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son, *
> * that whoever believes in Him should not perish... John 3:16 *
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I would rather spend 10 hours reading someone else's source code than
10 minutes listening to Musak waiting for technical support which isn't.
-- Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center
