JS> I would like to know what is it that you like so much about JS> Emacs+Gnus? I am not trying to be sarcastic or something like that. JS> I have tried to configure gnus a few times for using with email and JS> found it a frustration to get working. In which ways would gnus be JS> better than mutt and pine for example? Maybe I never saw it working JS> properly.
JS> I like emacs and use it regularly, but could never understand why the JS> gnus users are so enthusiastic about using gnus for mail. I'm happy Emacs+Gnus user. I've used pine before. One reason why I've changed my mail reader was: 1) I want one client for both mail and news. 2) I use Emacs for almost everything. Gnus is convenient for me because I got used to Emacs keybindings. Gnus is convenient for me because it is integrated in Emacs. Many people seems to dislike Gnus a lot because it forces them to read their mails in quite specific way. This is because in first place Gnus is newsreader. First time after my transition I also found it quite confusing but now I got used to it. Some other pros I've found later against pine: 1) Gnus have support for threading (I know recent version of pine also have support for this but last version I've used did not have it) 2) With help of supercite it can make very complex quoting 3) With help of mailcrypt it has *integrated* support for PGP 4) I like adaptive scoring which I use to filter Debian and FreeBSD maillists. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/) | | GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 | | AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-