I'm thinking tinker && reboot... If tinker fails, you really don't want to kill your uptime...
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Rob Mahurin wrote: >On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: >> >> where stable rules. Maintenance then isn't 'tinker & reboot', > >Shouldn't this be 'tinker ; reboot' ? If you use an ampersand your >tinkering will be backgrounded and get interrupted by the reboot >process. > >Rob > > -- There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with suitable application of High Explosives. Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
