Hello, I'm the maintainer for the nano package. Some time ago I added a .desktop file in nano, but now I wonder if it's correct to have it there, so I'm looking for user opinions. Nano isn't GUI-based or anything, it's a curses editor. Do you people think it should show up in GNOME's Applications section or should I remove the .desktop file entirely?
Thanks, Jordi [please cc me as I don't follow this list] -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos de Leyenda || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://debian.org http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
--- Begin Message ---On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:11:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > just for interest: is a gnome meny really the right place for the > "nano" entry? All other editors there have an Gtk-GUI, all but "nano" > which does not even run gnome-terminal for that. There is IIRC no policy > about that, but I think the location is a bit weird. Hello Edward, I'm not a GNOME user myself, and hadn't noticed this. I wrote nano.desktop as I thought it was cool. As there's the Debian menus still, I guess I should remove them. Or we could ask debian-user. What do you think? I personally don't care as I don't use the panel. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos de Leyenda || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://debian.org http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
pgp5WQ2p7dBVo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
pgpAD34LYY4wD.pgp
Description: PGP signature