I don't want to start a war here and I've refrained from replying to the many other posts, but there are many NT machines which go for weeks and months on end without being rebooted.
My departmental NT server had been up for 120-something days last time I was there. I've been on vacation for a few weeks so I don't know what it's at now. Maybe it's luck; maybe our NT admins just know what the hell they're doing. With MCSE's at a dime a dozen anymore, it's hard to find people with a genuine clue. Perhaps my company has done just that. *shrug* Anyways, I'm done with this thread. It started as an attempt at humor. I suppose there's still many of those people with the attitude that Linux is a better operating system than Windows at everything there is. Then again, those with a clue understand that it's a matter of which tool is best suited for the job at hand. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Topa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:16 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: networking windows and linux Subject: RE: networking windows and linux Date: Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:29:24PM -0500 In reply to:Jeremy Gaddis Quoting Jeremy Gaddis([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Wow, Windows isn't a stable server!? > > Damn, I bet that's news to the millions of > people and corporations worldwide who've been > running it for years. ;) > But not to to their System admins, I'd bet. Having to reboot often is not what I would call stable. -- Bringing computers into the home won't change either one, but may revitalize the corner saloon. _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
