On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:54:02AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:35PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> > > despite wonderful packages like file-rc, the /etc/rc?.d structure is
> > > damn difficult to maintain, is it not? in fact, here is the only tool
> > > that i miss from my redhat days - some text-oriented tool which let
> > > you specify the order and runlevels of each of the scripts in
> > > /etc/init.d. is there something like that?
> > > 
> > > how do you guys manage these?
> > 
> > I created the attached script to manage rc*d.  It is a little rough as it 
> > is my first write but it works for my needs at the moment.
> 
> Er! Surely that's just a clone of update-rc.d?
> 

Your making a joke right?  I've never looked at the source for
update-rc.d.  Have no idea what it is written in.  Hmmm, just looked and
it's written in Perl.  I created it to manage an LFS system.  Even if
it was a "clone" as you say, what difference would it make?  It's what I
use to manage my links to /etc/init.d, which was what the original
poster requested. 
kent

 

Reply via email to