Ross Burton wrote: > Wrong order, unstable is less stable than testing. Testing is packages > being tested for stable.
Depends. Testing contains packages that have gone some period of time in unstable without any crippling bugs reported, but on the other hand, when a nasty bug manages to creep into testing, it stays there for a while because the fix has to go through the same process of being submitted to unstable and being used for a while without any further crippling bugs reported. Personally, I don't run testing, and don't want to. I'd rather run unstable; at least when there is a problem, I'll get the fix ASAP. Craig