On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:01:45AM -0500, DvB wrote: > oivvio polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well not exactly dominating. Maybe not secretly either. But it sounded good. > > This oneliner from the department of utterly useless info tells it all: > > > > agrep "^User-Agent: ,^X-Mailer: " user|perl -ne 'chomp;/.+?: > > (.?.?.?[^\d,\(,\[,\/]{1,14}).*/; $o=$1; $o=~s/ //g;print "$o\n";'|sort|uniq > > -dc|sort -rn > > > > I believe you can find Pine users by looking at the MessageID (Pine > doesn't appear to set X-Mailer or User-Agent).
Also, a more fair count would associate senders with user-agents ... if I send 100 emails with mutt, and 10 other users send 10 emails each with Outlook, which is more popular? (From a number of users standpoint, Outlook should be the answer). Your script doesn't account for this. Yeah, I know it was all for fun :) -- Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better Micromuse Ltd. | than a perfect plan tomorrow. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Patton
pgpbCimzlkLTH.pgp
Description: PGP signature