Ricardo Gazoni gravada:
> Osamu Aoki gravada: > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:36:24PM -0300, Ricardo Gazoni wrote: > > > Yes, I did. In fact, step 1 loaded /boot/config-2.2.19pre17 and saved it > > > in > > > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.19pre17/.config. To be precise, doing this via > > > make > > > xconfig only adds comment lines to the .config file. I checked it out > > > carefully.... > > > > > > > > Everything worked just fine until now. But the old kernel image > > > > > (vmlinuz-2.2.19pre17) is 1.001.473 bytes long, and the new one > > > > > (vmlinuz-2.2.19foo17) is 1.033.565 bytes long. But the worst thing > > > > > is that the new kernle doesn't boot. What am I doing wrong?? > > > > If difference is few bytes, I suppose some difference in compile > > condition may have contributed. But 30KB is large. > > > > Just to be sure, why not recompile without using xconfig. > > > > Also check difference in /boot/System.map-2.2.19.... > > > > Also are you using right compiler version. > > > > Besides, recompile again and see whether result is same or not. If > > different, you may have had memory corruption during compile. Good luck > > :-) > > -- > > ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ > > + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D + > > + My debian quick-reference, http://www.aokiconsulting.com/quick/ + > > Compiler version seems OK. Both kernels reports gcc version 2.7.2.3. But the > files > /boot/System.map-2.2.19foo17 and /boot/System.map.2.2.19pre17 do differ, but > I don't know > what it means. I'm going to try to compile without using xconfig now, to see > what > happens. > > Thanks a lot OK: just compiled bypassing xconfig: worked fine!!! It seems that there were some configuration variables (marked NEW in make config) that were not set in the old kernel configuration file, and xconfig assumed as set to Y. Thats why the new kernel was 30k bigger... Thanks a lot again!!! Gaz
