On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 09:40:56PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > Oh how fun. I will attempt to educate our MIS department on why > > responding to the Mail From: is wrong, and responding to the envelope > > From: is better. > > > > Sorry. > > I don't think it was really coming from micromuse.com; you saw it that > way because you're at micromuse.com. The antigen thing is sending out > mails with no domain in the From: header (just From: ANTIGEN), and your > mail server was probably rewriting it to be RFC-conformant.
Hmm. I guess you're right ... I just looked at the headers. The "(Norman,Sophos)" bit threw me ... what's my name doing there?? :) BTW, a blank From: is compliant iff the message is a bounce (I think I've got that right). Regards, -- Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better Micromuse Ltd. | than a perfect plan tomorrow. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Patton
pgpsG342igQLQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
